HIV has frustrated vaccine designers for forty years. The virus mutates constantly, rolling out new variants faster than any single immunization can keep pace. But one small region of its outer surface barely changes at all — a stretch of amino acids so conserved across HIV strains that it represents the closest thing scientists have found to a universal vulnerability on the virus. The catch: that region sits at the exact spot where the virus's surface protein anchors into the viral membrane, tucked in a crevice that standard laboratory methods cannot reach. A team at Scripps Research has now cleared that obstacle.
The researchers, working with the nonprofit IAVI and publishing in Nature Communications on February 10, developed a platform based on lipid nanodiscs — tiny lipid patches, each roughly the size of a virus particle, that hold viral surface proteins in the same orientation and environment they occupy in an actual infection. This lets scientists study regions of the protein that are normally removed in conventional vaccine design, including the membrane-proximal external region, or MPER. The MPER is the target of a class of antibodies called broadly neutralizing antibodies: immune proteins capable of disabling a wide range of HIV variants. The best of these, an antibody called 10E8, neutralizes between 92 and 98 percent of HIV strains tested in laboratory studies.
The platform produced immediate results. By placing the HIV surface protein in nanodiscs and then systematically removing specific sugar molecules near the MPER, the team improved 10E8's binding affinity 70-fold, from 250 nanomolar to 3.6 nanomolar. A single point mutation in the protein's anchor region was responsible for most of that gain. The researchers also solved the structure of the entire MPER region as it exists in the native membrane, at 3.5 angstroms resolution using cryo-electron microscopy. That structural detail shows exactly how the antibody interfaces with the membrane and the protein simultaneously — something that has never been visible before using truncated protein versions.
"We're studying these proteins in a setting that better reflects their natural environment, which is critical if we want to understand how protective antibodies recognize a virus," said William Schief, a professor of immunology and microbiology at Scripps and executive director of vaccine design at IAVI's Neutralizing Antibody Center.
The practical workflow is notably tractable. The process from transfected cells to purified nanodiscs takes five days, handles up to twelve samples in parallel, and yields between 100 and 700 micrograms of usable material per liter of cell culture. The nanodiscs remain stable for at least three months when refrigerated. Kimmo Rantalainen, the study's first author and a senior scientist in Schief's lab, described the achievement as integration rather than invention: the individual components existed, but combining them into a reproducible and scalable system was the real advance.
The team demonstrated the platform's versatility beyond HIV. The same conditions used to prepare HIV surface proteins in nanodiscs worked for Ebola virus glycoprotein, with antibodies against Ebola binding with affinities of 46 nanomolar and 16 nanomolar respectively. The approach is applicable to any virus with a membrane-bound surface protein, which includes influenza and SARS-CoV-2 alongside HIV and Ebola.
There is a structural reason this matters. Standard recombinant vaccine design typically removes the transmembrane anchor and adjacent regions of viral surface proteins to make the proteins easier to produce and handle in the lab. The resulting truncated versions have been the backbone of most vaccine development for decades, including the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. But that truncation necessarily discards the MPER and adjacent regions — exactly the sequences that are most conserved and most vulnerable to broadly neutralizing antibodies. Nanodiscs preserve those regions.
The question of what comes next is honest. Every result in the paper is in vitro. The team showed that nanodisc-displayed proteins bind the target antibodies with high affinity, but not yet that immunization with these constructs produces better antibody responses in animals or humans. A related HIV vaccine construct is already in the HVTN 302 phase 1 clinical trial, and a parallel mRNA-LNP booster strategy demonstrated proof-of-concept for the bnAb induction pathway in human trials reported in 2025. The nanodisc platform provides a new tool for optimizing and testing immunogens intended to elicit exactly these kinds of antibodies. The timeline to an MPER-targeted HIV vaccine remains measured in years.
The funding sources reflect the breadth of institutional commitment: the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, IAVI, and the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation. Schief also holds a dual position as vice president for protein design at Moderna, which holds commercial rights to some of the immunogens developed in the Scripps-IAVI collaboration. That kind of overlap is common in academic vaccine research, and it means the path from this laboratory result to an actual product runs through an entity with direct financial interests in the outcome.
For now the nanodisc platform gives vaccine designers something they have never had: direct structural access to the most durable target on HIV's surface, in an environment that actually resembles an infection. That does not mean a vaccine is imminent. It means the problem just became tractable in a way it was not before.