Before police identified Daniel Alejandro Moreno-Gama as the suspect who threw a Molotov cocktail at Sam Altman's San Francisco home, the 20-year-old had spent two years in an online community explicitly dedicated to stopping artificial intelligence.
Moreno-Gama, from Spring, Texas, was arrested on April 10 hours after allegedly hurling a firebomb at the gate of Altman's home in the Russian Hill neighborhood, then showing up three miles away at OpenAI's headquarters making threats. He faces eight charges including attempted murder and arson of an inhabited structure, and is being held without bail in San Francisco County Jail.
But the attack did not come from nowhere. According to the San Francisco Police Department, Business Insider, and the San Francisco Standard, Moreno-Gama had been active in a Discord server for PauseAI — a nonprofit focused on halting frontier AI development — for approximately two years. He posted 34 messages in that time. In December 2025, he wrote: "We are close to midnight, it's time to actually act." A moderator responded that advocating violence was grounds for a ban. None of his messages contained explicit calls for violence before last Friday, according to PauseAI's published statement.
The "midnight" message was not a conversation with an AI chatbot. It was self-posted radicalization in an anti-AI community.
Moreno-Gama also maintained a Substack where he wrote about AI existential risk, describing the technology as an extinction-level threat to humanity, according to the San Francisco Chronicle. He described Altman as, as the Standard reported, "consistently reported to be a pathological liar."
Altman responded to the attack in a blog post on April 10 that included a rare photo of his husband and their child. "The fear and anxiety about AI is justified," he wrote. "We are in the process of witnessing the largest change to society in a long time, and perhaps ever." He later walked back on X an implication in the post that critical journalism had incited the attack.
Days before the firebombing, OpenAI had published a 13-page policy document titled "Industrial Policy for the Intelligence Age," calling for a public wealth fund, a robot tax, and a four-day workweek — proposals the company framed as necessary to prevent the economic disruption its own technology would cause. The document acknowledged the company was building something that could reshape society faster than society was prepared to handle, as the Standard reported.
The policy agenda and the attack landed in the same news cycle. But the suspect's grievances appear to have originated not from OpenAI's commercial work but from a years-long engagement with communities explicitly opposed to it.
PauseAI said Moreno-Gama was not a member in any formal sense, had no role in the organization, and was banned after the attack. "Violence against anyone is antithetical to everything we stand for," the group said in a statement. Stop AI, another anti-AI organization that has protested outside OpenAI's headquarters, also denied involvement and said it was praying for everyone affected.
The April 12 gunfire was unrelated to the Molotov attack. Two other suspects — Amanda Tom, 25, and Muhamad Tarik Hussein, 23 — were arrested for negligent discharge after a vehicle with occupants drove past Altman's property around 2:56 a.m. and someone in the passenger seat fired a round. San Francisco police said the incident did not appear to target Altman, and OpenAI confirmed it separately. Officers seized three firearms at a Taylor Street residence connected to the pair.
The suspect in the firebombing, Moreno-Gama, was booked at 12:47 p.m. on April 10. Charges include attempted murder, arson, criminal threats, and possession of an incendiary or destructive device. The San Francisco Police Department said he fled on foot from the home after the device bounced off the gate and was found approximately an hour later at OpenAI's Mission Bay offices, where he made additional threats. SFPD Chief Derrick Lew said the department was committed to holding perpetrators accountable and removing dangerous weapons from circulation.
What the attack exposed is a gap the AI industry has not yet seriously grappled with. OpenAI's own policy proposals acknowledge that fear about artificial intelligence is justified and that the technology could prove destabilizing to society. Moreno-Gama held the same view, arrived at through an online community explicitly organized around stopping AI development rather than through the AI systems themselves.
Whether that distinction shields the industry from scrutiny or complicates it is a question the criminal case will not answer.