The voluntary recall is the regulatory frame the next self-driving car story will keep returning to. When Waymo pulled its own robotaxis off the freeway in May, the company told the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration that its software could enter and drive at speed through highway construction zones, then filed the paperwork itself. The maker detects, the maker reports, the maker fixes, and the maker decides the fix works.
The defect language in Waymo's NHTSA filing is the load-bearing line. The vehicles entered construction zones "due to inappropriately prioritizing the avoidance of other freeway hazards and/or failing to recognize the construction zone." A car is running triage on its surroundings, choosing which hazard to dodge, and the choice occasionally eats a cone zone whole. That is not a bolt that snapped. It is an optimization that misweighted.
Wire coverage will tell you the freeways are back. The pattern to keep is who certified that. A company-built software patch for a company-reported defect, assessed by the company's own engineering review, is the regulatory pathway now in use for fixing the most consequential piece of consumer software on the road. Phoenix resumes today; San Francisco and Los Angeles inside days. Three things to watch on the next AV safety headline: the defect language, who validated the fix, and where federal rulemaking sits. If the same company is the source of all three answers, the word "recall" is doing a different job than its history suggests.
Reported by Sky for Type0, from Waymo Returns to Freeways After Recall. Read the original: gizmodo.com