CEO Vlad Tenev laid out a three vector strategy built around its card, its blockchain, and international expansion, and conceded the loudest vector has the weakest evidence so far.
Robinhood used to route its customers' activity to other people's rails and pay them for the privilege. On a recent appearance on Podcast Alpha, CEO Vlad Tenev laid out a company now trying to own those rails, the card that runs on them, and the spread on the trades and event contracts its users make.
Rothera, Robinhood's event-contract subsidiary, ran the majority of the company's World Cup event contracts, pulling that book back from third-party venues like Kalshi, Tenev said. The spread is the gap between the price a market maker pays to buy an asset and the price it charges a customer to sell one, and it is the piece of the business most customers will not notice.
"We have multiple vectors where the company can grow 10x and we're pursuing them in parallel," Tenev said. Three of those vectors are already producing numbers.
The first is the card. Robinhood's card franchise has roughly one million holders, $17 billion in annualized spend, and more than $100 million in annualized revenue, and it is profitable on a standalone basis. It is the only one of the three vectors already paying for itself.
The second is Robinhood Chain, an Arbitrum layer-2 built for real-world assets. According to Token Terminal, the chain crossed 100 million transactions and $10 billion in DEX volume inside weeks of launch, with block times of 100 milliseconds versus roughly 400 milliseconds on Solana. A Falcon X primer describes an early protocol stack that looks more like a payments-focused rollup than a general-purpose L1.
The third is international. Robinhood has 28.4 million funded customers, and Tenev said the company has just passed one million funded customers outside the US. The template is crypto first, then equities, retirement, and the card once regulators clear. Canada, which launched on top of the WonderFi, Bitbuy, and Coinsquare customer base and now lists roughly 50 coins, is the model.
The vertical-integration thread is what ties the three together. Robinhood is moving from a brokerage that sent orders to third-party venues to a platform that owns the rails, the payment instrument, and the spread on the activity it generates.
Tenev's own framing tempers the launch statistics. Much of the early Chain volume was meme coins tied to Robinhood lore, he conceded, and the metric he actually watches is total value locked, not transaction count. The 100-million-transactions figure is real, but it is also the kind of number that looks more like a launch statistic than a usage statistic, and the CEO is the first to say so.
That tension holds across the three vectors. The card is quiet, profitable, and growing on annualized spend, a metric that is harder to inflate with token-driven activity. Chain is loud, unproven on the metric Tenev says matters, and likely to attract more scrutiny as it ages. International is the easiest to underestimate because the absolute customer count is still small, but it is the vector that lets Robinhood amortize the chain and card investments across a much larger addressable market, and it is the one where the regulatory clock, not the engineering clock, sets the pace.
Which leaves the question Tenev did not directly answer. What is the new Robinhood, in one word? A bank, because it owns the card and the deposits-like float? A casino, because the event-contract book and the meme-coin volume are now part of the product mix? Or an exchange, because the chain and the market-making both look like exchange economics applied to a new asset class?
It is becoming all three, and the strategic bet is that owning the spread on each is what ties them together. The bear case is also on the record. If Chain's volume does not migrate from memes to real-world assets, and if TVL does not catch up to the transaction count, the fastest-growing product in the company is also the one with the shortest half-life. The card is the part of the bet that does not need that bet to work.
Tenev did not say which of the three labels fits. He did say which metric he is watching, and it is not the one most of the launch coverage led with.