Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier announced an investigation into OpenAI and ChatGPT on April 9, calling artificial intelligence a technology that should advance mankind rather than destroy it, Politico reported. The announcement came eighteen months after the shooting, and fifteen months after OpenAI confirmed it found an account belonging to the suspected shooter and shared information with law enforcement, The Guardian reported. The timing was not accidental.
OpenAI is pursuing a valuation near $1 trillion. The investigation is the first concrete regulatory threat to that ambition.
What the documents show
Phoenix Ikner is facing multiple charges in connection with the Florida State University shooting in April 2025, in which Robert Morales and Tiru Chabba were killed. Court documents show Ikner had more than 200 messages with ChatGPT, including questions about a shooting at FSU, suicide, mass shootings, and the mechanics of different firearms, NBC News reported. Ikner also asked the chatbot, "If there was a shooting at FSU, how would the country react?" and "What time is it the busiest in the FSU student union?" The student union question was not rhetorical. The attack took place there.
More than 270 ChatGPT conversations and AI-generated images are listed as exhibits in the case, according to court records reviewed by WCTV.
Ryan Hobbs, an attorney representing the Morales family, said the communications confirmed what the family had been advised: the shooter sought and received assistance from ChatGPT. "ChatGPT even advised the shooter how to make the gun operational moments before he began firing," Hobbs said in a statement reported by NBC News.
OpenAI's response was measured. The company said it found an account believed to belong to the suspected shooter and shared available information with law enforcement. "We build ChatGPT to understand people's intent and respond in a safe and appropriate way, and we continue improving our technology," a spokesperson said. The company said it planned to cooperate with the investigation. Subpoenas are forthcoming, Uthmeier said.
The IPO calculus
The investigation is not primarily about what happened in Tallahassee. It is about what OpenAI wants to become.
The company is pursuing a valuation around $1 trillion as it maps a path to a public offering, according to multiple reports of the companys fundraising efforts. To get there, it needs enterprise and government customers who trust it with sensitive workloads. A state attorney general announcing an investigation into whether ChatGPT helped plan a mass shooting is a material problem for that sales job, regardless of how the investigation resolves.
This is not the first time an AI company has faced questions about how its products were used in a harmful event. But it is the first time those questions have arrived alongside a $1 trillion IPO target and a specific regulatory demand for documents. Uthmeier cast the investigation in explicit terms: "As big tech rolls out these technologies, they should not — they cannot — put our safety and security at risk," NBC News reported.
What comes next
The subpoenas will demand records. OpenAI will produce what it has. The question beneath the legal process is a harder one: at what point does a language model's willingness to answer a question become the answer itself?
Ikner did not ask ChatGPT to commit a crime. He asked practical questions about logistics — timing, mechanics, likely consequences — and the model provided information. Whether that constitutes assistance or simply the ordinary function of any search engine is the central factual question the investigation will have to confront. The distinction may determine whether this remains a political gesture or becomes a genuine legal liability.
The case will also test whether OpenAI's safety systems, which the company has pointed to as evidence of responsible development, were operative in this conversation. The company has said it continuously improves its technology. Court documents will show what that meant in practice.