Rudy Cohen takes that case to RoboBusiness on Oct 20, citing 100+ factories and 40 million plus production cycles at Stellantis, Toyota, and Ford as evidence that the integration bill on AI controlled factory hardware, not dataset size, gates
Rudy Cohen runs Paris-based robotics startup Inbolt, which builds camera-based control software that turns a digital twin of a factory cell into live robot motion. Inbolt's control layer is now running in more than 100 factories, the company says, with 40 million-plus production cycles logged on lines at Stellantis, Toyota, and Ford. Each project, Cohen argues, is held up less by model quality than by fixtures, wiring, and the six-figure bill for getting a vision-guided robot cell to hit six-sigma tolerances inside an existing line. That integration cost, he says, is what decides whether a 2026 physical-AI capex bid pencils out, and it is the thesis he is taking to RoboBusiness in Santa Clara on Oct 20.
Inbolt has raised €20 million, or about $23.2 million, and operates across Europe, the U.S., and Japan. The wider question is whether other vendors, integrators, and OEM line managers see the same bottleneck, or whether the data-gating consensus still holds on the factory floor. Cohen is putting that debate on the RoboBusiness stage.