The Federal Communications Commission has approved 227 experimental drone licenses since January 2025, a 68 percent jump from the prior four-year period, according to DroneDJ. Eight counter-drone technology authorizations have been issued for the first time at that volume. And the agency is now asking industry to draft its own reform roadmap. That is the unusual part.
The FCC released a public notice on April 1 titled "Unleashing American Drone Dominance", formally asking companies, operators, and innovators to identify regulatory barriers slowing domestic drone deployment. The notice covers spectrum access for command-and-control links, rules for beyond-visual-line-of-sight operations, detect-and-avoid systems, and the agency's Covered List of restricted foreign-made equipment including DJI, the Chinese commercial drone maker, and other Chinese-origin systems. Comments are due May 1, with reply comments until May 18.
Chairman Brendan Carr had signaled the direction weeks earlier. He visited Anduril Industries' test site in Texas, touring the facilities with CEO Brian Schimpf and COO Matt Grimm, and called the company's counter-drone and autonomous systems the tip of the spear for domestic manufacturing. The framing aligns with Executive Order 14307, which President Trump signed in June 2025, designating drone production, deployment, and exports as core elements of U.S. technological sovereignty and global competitiveness.
The notice itself asks what to fix. The answer from commercial operators has been consistent for years: the approval process for routine beyond-visual-line-of-sight operations, which most commercial delivery and infrastructure inspection models depend on, is slow, opaque, and unpredictable. The Commercial Drone Alliance, an industry group, has described the regulatory environment for routine drone use as undefined, per a supply chain white paper it published in March. The FCC notice does not address the FAA bottleneck directly. That agency handles operational safety approvals. But it opens questions about spectrum allocation and innovation zones that could reshape where and how commercial drones operate.
ResilienX, a drone operations company, holds one of the few active routine BVLOS waivers in the country, covering 1,900 square miles of central New York through the NUAIR surveillance network until September 2029. That waiver represents the exception rather than the rule.
Anduril's visibility in this process raises a structural question the notice does not answer. The company has counter-drone contracts, including a reported $20 billion Army award announced in March that align with the national security framing the FCC has adopted. Whether the resulting reforms benefit a broad range of commercial operators or primarily those building defense-adjacent systems is the open issue. The FCC asking industry what to fix is reasonable in theory. In practice, it tends to amplify the voices of companies with Washington presence and regulatory bandwidth, not the small operator running a single delivery route waiting for an FAA waiver.
The Covered List adds another layer. The FCC added all foreign-produced drones and critical components in December 2025 following a national security determination. The first conditional exemptions, covering systems deemed trusted, were issued March 18 to SiFly Aviation, Mobilicom, ScoutDI, and Verge AI. Those exemptions run through the end of 2026. New foreign-made models that have not received FCC equipment authorization face effective bans under current rules. DJI, the market leader in commercial drones, filed a lawsuit against the FCC in February to overturn the designation.
The FCC is not the only hurdle. Commercial drone operations require coordinated approvals from the FAA on safety, the FCC on spectrum, and in some cases the Department of Defense for operations near sensitive facilities. That layered system is what the notice is asking industry to help untangle. The comment period is the opening move in what could be a multi-year rulemaking process. What gets written into the record in the next 30 days will shape which companies can scale and which remain permanently experimental.
† Add footnote: "† Source-reported; not independently verified."