On July 1, 2026 the repository becomes an independent nonprofit, funded by the Simons Foundation and Schmidt Sciences, raising fresh questions about who now governs a piece of open science infrastructure the world depends on.
Two philanthropies, the Simons Foundation and Schmidt Sciences, now sit behind the free preprint server that physicists, mathematicians, and AI researchers depend on every day. That is the news in arXiv's July 1, 2026 transition out of Cornell University into an independent nonprofit. It is also the open question the transition leaves behind.
For non-beat readers: arXiv, pronounced "archive," is a free, open repository where scientists post research papers before peer review. Founded in 1991 at Los Alamos National Laboratory and hosted by Cornell since 2001, it now holds roughly two million papers across physics, mathematics, computer science, quantitative biology, and a long list of adjacent fields. A generation of AI research, including most of the foundational papers in modern machine learning, was first posted there. If you have read a paper hosted on arXiv, you have read a piece of critical scientific infrastructure.
That infrastructure is changing hands.
On July 1, 2026, arXiv formally becomes an independent nonprofit organization, ending its 25-year run under the Cornell University umbrella. The new entity is backed by major funding from the Simons Foundation and Schmidt Sciences. arXiv's own June 30 update says users "will not notice much change at all": the mission stays the same, the site stays free to read and free to submit, and submission, fee, and moderation policies carry over.
What changes is not the product. It is the governance.
For the past quarter-century, stewardship of arXiv lived inside a research university with an institutional mandate to preserve open access. That mandate is not portable. Under the new nonprofit structure, the platform will be governed by a board and an advisory structure funded by private philanthropy, a model that has supported other open-science efforts but one that ultimately answers to two named donors, not a public-mission institution. The arXiv FAQ on the spinout sketches the new governance and funding arrangements, but the long-term question of who decides what happens to a platform the global research community depends on remains open.
Cornell, for its part, is framing the move as a handoff rather than a withdrawal. The university's companion explainer in the Cornell Chronicle describes the spinout as a "new chapter" for the digital research repository after a generation of stewardship. The practical effect: arXiv's staff and volunteer moderators transition out of Cornell employment and into the new nonprofit. Cornell retains whatever role the new governance documents describe, no longer a host and now something more arms-length.
The brand, meanwhile, gets a refresh. arXiv is set to retire the red-dominated visual identity it inherited from Cornell in favor of a new look for the standalone nonprofit. The rebrand is real but cosmetic, a marker of the new chapter rather than a signal of policy change.
The research community has been watching the transition unfold on forums like r/MachineLearning, where reactions split into two camps. Some researchers worry about philanthropic dependency, asking what happens if Simons or Schmidt Sciences changes priorities in five or ten years and what accountability looks like when open-science infrastructure is no longer housed at a public-mission university. Others argue that a standalone nonprofit is overdue for a repository whose scope, scale, and global user base long ago outgrew any one institution. Both reactions are worth taking seriously. Neither is dispositive; the source basis is a clean transition announcement, not a crisis or a transformation.
What is worth tracking next is not the brand color or the press release. It is the governance document. When the new nonprofit publishes its bylaws, board composition, and long-term funding commitments, the answer to the real question, who holds the keys to a preprint server the scientific world runs on, will start to become legible. Until then, arXiv's users are being asked to trust two philanthropies with a piece of infrastructure that, like the open web itself, only works if it stays open.